MILITEC OIL Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Summary
MILITEC-1 OIL receives mixed reviews; it excels as a lubricant and is praised for reducing fouling and dust attraction. However, its claims on rust prevention and cleaning efficiency are questioned, with some users reporting rust issues and needing solvents. Overall, many swear by its performance in harsh environments, but caution against relying on it alone for protection.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Lubrication Performance
80%
Many reviewers laud MILITEC-1 for its superior lubrication capabilities, describing it as smooth, slick, and effective in reducing friction in various firearms. Users highlight notable improvements in weapon reliability and operation, particularly after transitioning from CLP products.
Rust Prevention Claims
65%
A significant number of reviewers express skepticism about MILITEC-1's rust prevention claims, suggesting that it may not effectively protect against corrosion as advertised. Some users report rust occurrences, indicating that while it serves well as a lubricant, it should not be relied upon solely for rust protection.
Application Method
45%
Several reviews mention the specific application process required for optimal effectiveness, which includes heating the oil and properly applying it. Users note that this added step can lead to better results but may be seen as a drawback for those looking for convenience.
Durability in Harsh Conditions
70%
Reviewers often reference their experiences using MILITEC-1 in tough environments, particularly military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. The product's ability to withstand dust and dirt buildup while maintaining lubrication is frequently praised, making it a favored choice among users who face challenging conditions.
Cleaning Efficiency
50%
A few users find that MILITEC-1 improves cleaning efficiency by preventing fouling, while others dispute this claim and mention that additional solvents are still necessary for effective cleaning. The divergence in opinions suggests that results may vary based on individual usage and expectations.
Best oil
Works as advertised, doesn't gum up on your gun. Attracts very little dust and protests against rust extremely well. You don't have to use as much as other oils since it bonds with the metal. It stays were you put it and it doesn't smear off on your hands. Best gun oil I have ever used.
Outperforms CLP
As others have done, I too took my own lube and cleaning gear on my deployments. Militec outperformed CLP and the stuff the British troops were using. Never had gun problems during my Iraq or Afghanistan tours. I now use it for lubing student's guns before the range exercises begin. The Militec website has good directions on how to use this product and following the directions improves an already great lube.
Garbage.
Claims to be 3x better at preventing rust than CLP. Claims to prevent fouling from building up. Claims to contain no chlorine. Claims to bond to the metal and can be wiped dry, and that you can clean your firearm with just more Militech without the need of a solvent or, "CLP type product." Every corrosion test show this stuff is horrible. It does nothing to prevent fouling... though most lubricants don't. It was rejected (as an engine oil additive, "the exact same stuff in the bottle," according to one of their techs) because it contained chlorine. It does not make cleaning any easier and you still need to use something with a solvent.
Junk.
A decent lubricant but that is all. The claims of preventing rust have been proven to be false, probably from the chlorine content they claim isn't in it. A great EP additive, a pathetic rust preventative (actually causes rust). Doesn't prevent or reduce fouling buildup like they claim. Doesn't eliminate the need for a CLP or solvent for cleaning like they claim. It's just a decent oil base. Perhaps a little thicker than CLP, but then you'd be better off with Break Free LP, or Tetra, or SLIP 2000, or TW-25b, or 10W40. Whether applied then the gun fired to heat it up, or applied then a heat gun used, it doesn't work as claimed. It's been rejected multiple times by the military, starting in the 80's by the USMC when it was marketed as an engine oil additive.

