RUGER 10/22 25RD MAGAZINE 22LR Reviews & Ratings

Extra-tough, polymer magazines are self-lubricating and hold 25 rounds of .22LR ammo. Constant force spring provides uniform feeding and smooth loading. Two alternating, interlocking notches make it easy to “click” two or three mags together for fast reloads and increased shooting time. Available with separately molded, Stainless Steel (SS) feed lips for optimum performance. Fits Ruger® 10/22® and 77/22®, and AMT Lightning.

View Product

Write a review

5 Stars

Reviews Summary

The Ruger 10/22 25rd magazine has garnered mixed reviews. Many users appreciate its solid construction and reliability, while others criticize its fit and jamming issues. Though some found success with specific ammo types, the magazines often require modifications for optimal performance. Overall, quality control seems to be inconsistent, leading to disappointment for many buyers.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Product Quality

60%

Reviewers express mixed feelings about the quality of the magazines. While some praise their solid construction and reliability, many report issues with the fit, materials used, and performance failures. This inconsistency in quality has led to frustration for users who expected better.

Fit and Compatibility

50%

Several customers mention problems with the magazines not fitting well in their rifles, requiring modifications to work properly. Users often note that the magazines are too snug or too loose in the magazine well, impacting their usability.

Performance Issues

70%

Numerous reviews highlight issues such as jamming and failure to feed. These problems persist across different types of ammunition, with some users recommending against these magazines due to reliability concerns. This indicates a significant quality control problem.

Comparison to Other Brands

40%

Many users compare the Butler Creek magazines unfavorably to Ruger's factory magazines, with several confirming that the factory options perform significantly better in terms of reliability and feeding. This comparison highlights the perceived shortcomings of the Butler Creek magazines.

Modification Necessity

35%

A notable number of reviews mention the need for modifications to make the magazines work properly, indicating a lack of readiness for use right out of the packaging. This is seen as an inconvenience and a reflection of the product's poor quality.

Sort by Filter by rating

Butler Creek 10 22, 25 round magazines

To be honest I haven't been to the range yet to see how these magazines will work once I start actually shooting. That being said, me being the way I am I took the magazines out of the packages and tried them for fit. Now I did not buy these for a 10/22. I am shooting a ruger rpr. It takes the same magazines and I wanted something more than a ten round magazine. So I purchased these. The first thing I noticed was that they were very snug in the well. I actually had to sand down the sides so that they would fit in the magazine well properly. They do feed and extract like they are supposed to. Again I will see how they do at the range this coming weekend. For now I am going to only give these magazines a 2 due to the fact that I had to do some finish work to make them work properly. I would recommend them but with the understanding that they may have to make some adjustments.