WARNE MFG. COMPANY - 30mm Medium (0.99") Dovetail Rings, Black

When installing a 3 x 9 x 40 scope on a Marlin 22 found that standard .22 rings were not high enough for the scope to clear the barrel. Was pleased to see the quality of these rings as well as the ease of installing. After mounting when checking the boresight only minor adjustment was needed.

The fact that these rings will fit both sizes of .22 dovetails (do not expect them to fit weaver / picatinny rails, they are NOT intended to do so) makes it so you need only need one stock item on the shelf not two for these jobs. These rings are top quality. A BIG plus is the "clamp" section does NOT foul the bolt handle as some other makes do. The need for windage adjustment should never be a concern, this feature only produces a ring that has a lack of rigidity and strength. Added to the fact they are cheaper than a very similar brand of rings I cannot speak too highly about them.

Plenty high enough for a 42mm objective. Great holding.

Top quality, adaptable to European 11mm or American Standard 3/8" dovetail dimensions. Finish and fit are precise. Use matted rings on matted receivers and gloss rings on highly polished receivers for best appearance.

Well, I pretty much use Warne rings exclusively; it goes without saying that I'm normally more than satisfied with their products. I bought these rings to use with the supplied rail for a Ruger 10-22. The attachment "legs" of these rings are an odd size. They are far too small to fit a Weaver/picatinny rail. On the 10-22, there's a second smaller rail that they did fit well enough to use the scope on the gun, but they were still too small to attach properly; they tilted the scope, and I don't believe the scope was centered to the bore line. Yes, I was able to use the scope, but I never felt right about it and ended up switching to some Leupold rings that fit the Weaver rail properly. Perhaps these were designed to fit another size of rail that I'm not familiar with? Even with a differently sized rail width, I'd still question whether or not the scope was centered to the bore line. Other than all of that, the materials and craftsmanship were typical of Warne's superior quality. I still intend to turn to Warne as my first choice for mounts; unfortunately, these rings leave me wondering if I missed a memo somewhere???