CO-AX RELOADING PRESS Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Summary
The Co-Ax Reloading Press is favored by many for its ease of use, lever design, and quick die changes, offering superior accuracy for precision loading. However, some users have reported issues with the primer system and inadequate handling for larger calibers. Overall, it is regarded as a top choice among dedicated reloaders looking for meticulous results.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Ease of Use
70%
Many reviewers emphasize the Co-Ax press's user-friendly design, highlighting quick die changes and versatility in reloading. Users appreciate how straightforward it is to operate, making it suitable for both seasoned and novice reloaders. This theme is mentioned by approximately 70% of reviewers.
Accuracy and Quality
65%
The press is frequently praised for its ability to produce consistent, high-quality ammunition with minimal run-out. Users note its engineering excellence and how it significantly contributes to improved precision in their reloads. This theme resonates with about 65% of reviewers.
Build Quality
60%
Numerous reviewers remark on the durable build and solid nature of the Co-Ax press. Users appreciate its long-lasting performance with minimal maintenance required. Many have used theirs for decades with consistent satisfaction. Approximately 60% of reviewers noted this aspect.
Primer System
40%
Several customers mentioned challenges with the primer seating system, citing difficulties with setup and operation. Some found it less efficient compared to other methods. This concern was raised by about 40% of reviewers, pointing toward a common area where improvement is needed.
Versatility
30%
While the Co-Ax excels in many areas, some users noted that it falls short in handling larger cartridges without additional components. This limitation has been a point of frustration for some reviewers who expected broader capabilities. This topic was discussed by roughly 30% of reviewers.
Forster co-ax press
I really like this press but it came in damaged from shipping. I contacted Forester and they sent replacement parts.
Would you recommend this?
Yes, I would recommend to a friend
My favorite press with a couple of provisos.
This is hands down my favorite press for all my precision loading. Extremely easy to change dies and no extra shell holders are needed. However, mine will not accept the large rims of my 45-70 Government. Two sizes of shell holders are a bit tricky to change. The primer seater is awkward to set up properly. Regardless, for most traditional cartridges, this is the premier single-stage loader.
Great value and capability...but..
In a nut shell... great overall design... in need of some manufacturing improvements. In the year and a half in which I've been using this press for both pistol and rifle reloading, I have had no major issues, but have taken note of some particular details. The Co-Axial design is highly regarded by the highly regarded, or, at least, that's what I've read in Mic McPherson's "In Pursuit of the Perfect Cartridge". Norma's Ballistics Lab, for example, uses them for load development. That, if nothing else, should be a ringing endorsement. However, there are some details about the Forster's manufacture that I've found to be mildly disappointing. For instance, the grinding wheel marks from removing the casting flash are very apparent and negatively impact the visual quality of the press. Off Course, this has no real bearing on the actual functionality of the press, but appearance is important for just about any product. Likewise, the shell holder jaws could have been machined more precisely and evenly. They certainly work well considering their versatility. I have found it helpful to slightly loosen the allen head screws, which hold the jaws in place, when loading 30-40 Krag. The spent primer drop tube needs to be slightly larger in I.D., owing to the fact that large rifle primers have a tendency to get stuck and stack up, thereby slowing the de-capping process. Obviously, like everything else, there are advantages and disadvantages to a particular design, and its more a question of degree. In the case of the Co-Axial, the benefits far outweigh the faults. So, just as an example, if you want to break down live ammunition, you pretty much have to use Forster's Universal Bullet Puller Die with the appropriate collet(sold separately, of course), owing to the design and position of the yoke/handle. If this is rarely needed, then its not a big deal, but with a small mountain of surplus live ammo, it could be a different story. As for the issue/debate concerning which die lock ring to use, I use Forster's aluminum cross bolt style, as the press's instruction manual specifically advises. The fit in the press's die slot is better, and it will be the aluminum lock ring, and not the $300+ cast iron press that experiences wear. Although the primer system does require a little time to adjust properly when changing from one cartidge and/or primer size to another, it does a great job and has decent feel for a press-mounted primer seater. Still, despite the above-mentioned issues, I think it is the best single stage press on the market given the various design features for its price point. Will Forster come out with a new and improved B5 model???
Forster co-ax press
Excellent press! Very fast die changes. I have owned this press for years and never regretted paying extra for it. The priming setup is the ONLY draw back to it. No extra shellholders needed unless you are working on extremely large or extremely small cases, then you will need the LS shellholder jaws.

