CO-AX RELOADING PRESS Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Summary
The Co-Ax Reloading Press is favored by many for its ease of use, lever design, and quick die changes, offering superior accuracy for precision loading. However, some users have reported issues with the primer system and inadequate handling for larger calibers. Overall, it is regarded as a top choice among dedicated reloaders looking for meticulous results.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Ease of Use
70%
Many reviewers emphasize the Co-Ax press's user-friendly design, highlighting quick die changes and versatility in reloading. Users appreciate how straightforward it is to operate, making it suitable for both seasoned and novice reloaders. This theme is mentioned by approximately 70% of reviewers.
Accuracy and Quality
65%
The press is frequently praised for its ability to produce consistent, high-quality ammunition with minimal run-out. Users note its engineering excellence and how it significantly contributes to improved precision in their reloads. This theme resonates with about 65% of reviewers.
Build Quality
60%
Numerous reviewers remark on the durable build and solid nature of the Co-Ax press. Users appreciate its long-lasting performance with minimal maintenance required. Many have used theirs for decades with consistent satisfaction. Approximately 60% of reviewers noted this aspect.
Primer System
40%
Several customers mentioned challenges with the primer seating system, citing difficulties with setup and operation. Some found it less efficient compared to other methods. This concern was raised by about 40% of reviewers, pointing toward a common area where improvement is needed.
Versatility
30%
While the Co-Ax excels in many areas, some users noted that it falls short in handling larger cartridges without additional components. This limitation has been a point of frustration for some reviewers who expected broader capabilities. This topic was discussed by roughly 30% of reviewers.
Does not work w/ .338 Lapua out of box!!
This is an "o.k" press, but it isn't what I expected it to be. It comes pretty dirty . . . mine (ordered from Sinclair in early January, 2016, was covered in a sawdust-like material (box had not been opened and was factory-sealed). Fit and finish is more in line with the lower-end RCBS/Lee stuff than Dillon. Admittedly, I've only done a few .308 operations on this . . . I mainly purchased it for my .308 and .338 long-range needs (my Dillon gets the responsibility for the high-output stuff). There was nothing in the description (here on Sinclair/Brownells) or anywhere else that I looked that says that you need to spend an extra $30.00 for the larger jaws to accommodate the .338 Lapua round. Maybe it's just in my mind, but I think the .338 Lapua round has pretty well achieved mainstream status, and many folks buying the Co-Ax will be purchasing it to load the .338 round. Forster should include the larger jaws with the press, and Sinclair/Brownells (and everyone else) should make it very obvious that it will not accommodate the .338 round until Forster decides to take that step. I'm giving it the two stars because, from a design standpoint, it should work better than the others . . . and it is compact . . . much more so than I expected. It loses one star for the filth that it came in (and I'm not just talking about the typical machine oils/greases that are necessary for preservation), and two stars because it doesn't accommodate the .338 round (and that isn't made clear).

