SIG SAUER P320 STEEL MAGAZINE 9MM

SIG SAUER P320 STEEL MAGAZINE 9MM Reviews & Ratings

  • 17-round magazine
  • Fits Sig Sauer® P320™ 9mm pistol
  • Magazine body constructed of heat treated carbon steel with black oxide finish
  • Injection molded magazine follower
  • Magazine spring formed from heat treated chrome silicone wire
  • Made in USA
View Product
Write a review
Reviews Summary
The SIG SAUER P320 Steel Magazine has received mixed reviews, with many users highlighting significant compatibility and quality issues. Customers report problems with fit, poor performance, and concerns over durability, suggesting it may not be suitable for serious use. Some appreciate its appearance but recommend against using it for carry or competitions.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Compatibility
60%
Many reviewers expressed frustration over the magazine's compatibility, particularly with various grip modules and devices. There were consistent reports that the magazines do not fit well with AXG Legion or Wilson combat grips, leading users to perform modifications for proper use.
Performance Issues
70%
Numerous reviews highlighted performance shortcomings, including reliability problems like failure to drop free when empty and inconsistent follower function. Users noted that the magazines often failed to support full capacity, raising concerns about their suitability for critical use.
Build Quality
65%
Reviewers collectively criticized the build quality, indicating that the materials felt cheap and flimsy compared to factory magazines. Specific components like the base plates and springs were mentioned as subpar, further impacting overall reliability and usability.
Value for Money
50%
While some customers found the low price appealing, they concluded that the magazines did not deliver good value due to associated issues. Many users indicated they would rather save for higher quality options, especially for carry or critical applications.
Aesthetics
40%
Several reviews noted a positive aspect regarding the finish of the magazines, commenting that they appear well-made in terms of aesthetics, albeit this was overshadowed by performance and compatibility issues. Users felt that looks alone do not compensate for functionality.
1
Trash Mags
Doesn’t fit AXG Legion or metal grip modules. Performs terrible on X-Compact. Trash mags!!!
1
Not for
I got some of these ProMag P320 17rd magazines to try since they were on sale for $15. The body of the magazines seems fine, it has a finish that has a good grip, but might have drop issues when empty. The guts and base are cheap. The base plate insert is very flimsy and doesn’t align the base plate well. I have extra base plates and inserts so that is fine for me, but not everyone will have spares. I had to put in mag blocks so that helps stabilize the cheap spring. The follower is flimsy and might lead to feed issues. It was worth buying a few to try and have for the range, but I would not recommend them, nor use them for carry or competition. You get what you pay for.
1
Cheap junk
All sorts of issues. Spring is miss shaped so the follower doesnt ride right at all cause several issues. They dont drop free when empty. Will only run reliably with 15 rounds not the full 17. Cheap Chinese range mags after an hour of work each mag. DO NOT USE THESE FOR ANY DUTY/CARRY OR OTHERWISE PROTECTIVE PURPOSES.
1
Sig 17rnd Pro Mag magazine
The magazine would not activate slide lock lever with empty magazine. Stretching the spring was not a fix. I had to replace the spring with a Sig Sauer 13-coil OEM spring for full function.
1
Absolute garbage
Got three for Christmas, all three have issues where the followers will tilt and allow rounds to rattle around inside the mag and when empty pop out if the top. This is without ever even using them, just loading for the first time.