1911 45ACP MAGAZINES Reviews & Ratings

Robust, high-quality U.S. made magazines in blued carbon steel and stainless steel for 1911 Auto pistols chambered in a variety of calibers. Choose from round or flat steel followers, both designed to give positive last-round feeding with all bullet types, including wadcutters. Safety orange nylon follower is concave to hold an additional round. Three floorplate configurations available: Welded – Flat, steel plate permanently welded to magazine body, with screw holes to accept Metalform Bumper Pads.

SPECS: Blued carbon steel (Blue) or natural-finish stainless steel (Stnls). Approximately 5" (12.7cm) long. Followers – Stainless steel, natural silver or black finish, flat or round contour. Some magazines have concave safety orange nylon follower.

View Product

Write a review

Reviews Summary

The 1911 45ACP magazines receive mixed reviews, with some praising their reliability and price, while others report significant issues like defective products and poor construction. Many users find them comparable to higher-end brands, but concerns about the baseplates and feed issues prevail, suggesting inconsistent quality across batches.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Product Reliability

60%

Many reviewers express satisfaction with the magazines' reliability, noting that they function well with various types of ammunition. However, some users faced issues, particularly with feeding and magazine integrity, impacting overall satisfaction. About 60% of reviewers commented on reliability concerns.

Quality Control Issues

45%

A significant number of reviews highlight problems with quality control, specifically regarding baseplate and feed lip durability. Several users reported critical failures, indicating inconsistent manufacturing processes. This theme was noted by approximately 45% of reviewers.

Value for Money

50%

Despite the reliability issues mentioned, many users found these magazines to provide excellent value for the cost, comparing them favorably to more expensive brands. About 50% of reviewers mentioned that they believe the magazines perform well enough to justify their price.

Compatibility and Performance

55%

Reviews indicate a mixed experience with compatibility across different 1911 models, with some magazines fitting well and feeding flawlessly, while others experienced feed issues or failures. Around 55% of users discussed compatibility and how the mags interacted with their firearms.

Ease of Use and Maintenance

30%

Some users appreciate the design features that facilitate use and maintenance, though there are notes about difficulties in disassembly for cleaning. This aspect was mentioned by about 30% of reviewers, pointing to a need for clearer instructions or improved mechanisms.

Sort by Filter by rating

Poorly Made

Bought 10 of them, opened 2, both were defective, could not get the rounds to feed, same ammo fed fine in my other magazines. I returned all 10, don't order these, they need to be pulled from the market.

Do not buy - baseplates have poor welds

I bought two of these about two years ago and I've just had the baseplate fall completely off one of them. The culprit is the poor job done affixing them; only four small spot-welds hold the baseplate to the tube. Don't touch these. They might fail you when you need them most.

Sub part welds

I received two of these mags for use in my 1911 and BOTH of the base plates broke off in the same manner. I had seven round in the mag and when I tried to chamber a round, the base plate fell off, along with the spring, follower and the rest of the ammo. I will never buy these again.