BERETTA 92/M9 MAGAZINES 9MM Reviews & Ratings

You’ll gain reliable, additional round capacity with these high quality replacement magazines that really fit and function like proven factory magazines. Tempered steel body with hardened feed lips is treated with a phosphated anti-friction coating inside and out to ensure drop-free operation and no-jam feeding. Hardened, high tensile music wire spring and supported, self-lubricated nylon follower eliminates follower tilt so every round feeds flawlessly. Flush-fitting, 18-Round magazine features a tough synthetic base pad that removes easily for magazine cleaning. 20-Round model includes a removable, synthetic “Plus 2” base pad. Witness holes in the rear side on both models provide fast, remaining round count.

SPECS: Body - Hardened carbon steel, black phosphated anti-friction coating. Spring - High tensile music wire. Follower - Nylon, black. Fits Beretta M9 and M92, 9mm caliber. Does not Fit 92S.

View Product

Write a review

Reviews Summary

Customers praise the Mec-Gar magazines for their high quality, reliability, and smooth performance across numerous rounds. However, some users express frustration with difficulty loading the 18th round, leading to mixed feelings about the product's value. Overall, the magazines are well-regarded, especially for range and casual use.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Product Quality

70%

Most reviewers highlight the outstanding quality of the Mec-Gar magazines, stating they are equal or superior to factory options. Users appreciate the fit and finish, noting durability and reliable performance over extensive use.

Loading Issues

40%

Several reviews mention difficulties in loading the 18th round in the magazines, with some users unable to achieve the advertised capacity. This has led to disappointment, as users feel the product does not fully deliver on its claims.

Reliability

60%

Reviewers frequently commend the magazines for their reliability over many rounds of use, including in adverse conditions. Users report flawless function in various scenarios, showcasing the product's trustworthiness.

Performance in Tough Conditions

30%

Some customers note that while the magazines perform well in normal conditions, they require regular cleaning in harsh environments, which affects their overall satisfaction. The need for cleanliness is underscored by the potential for dirt accumulation around the loading indicators.

Value for Money

25%

While many find the magazines to offer excellent value, a few commenters feel conflicted due to loading issues that challenge the belief of worthiness at the price point. Positive experiences are mixed with concerns about the expected performance versus reality.

Sort by Filter by rating

Don't use in combat!

I bought 5 of these before my last combat tour in Afghanistan with the hope that I would finally have a good reliable magazine for my M9. Within 1 week of being in country they failed to feed. One of the problems is that they need cleaned literaly EVERY day due to the 18 round indicators in the rear allow alot of sand to get into it. Spring tension was HORRIBLE as well. I could only keep 5-6 rounds in the mag before you could hold it upside down and just shake rounds out of it. I would actually strip them down, clean them, and keep them in a plastic bag everytime I came back inside the wire. Only would recommend them for target shooting.