FALL BUILD FEST IS ON - Shop Exclusive Deals & Offers!
+ 12% Off Select AR15 Parts Use Code: ARBUILD12

FALL BUILD FEST IS ON - Shop Exclusive Deals & Offers!
+ 12% Off Select AR15 Parts Use Code: ARBUILD12

9MM MAGAZINES FOR SIG SAUER 320

9MM MAGAZINES FOR SIG SAUER 320 Reviews & Ratings

  • Flush fit for the Sig Sauer 9mm P320 Compact
  • Available in 15, 17, 21, 30 and 40-round capacity
  • Base plates interchangeable with ETS line of 9mm double stack magazines
  • Easy disassembly with our specially designed base plate
  • Ergonomically designed floor plate makes it easy to grab from mag pouches
  • Lifetime Warranty

ADVANCED POLYMER BENEFITS

  • Extreme Impact Resistance—won't crack or break when dropped
  • Very resistant to harsh chemicals
  • Superior heat, cold and UV resistance—won’t become brittle over time even when exposed to harsh environments or extreme cold
  • Translucent body—allowing you to see your ammo count and type
  • Creep resistant—the feed lips and body won't spread when being stored long term even when fully loaded
View Product
Write a review
Reviews Summary
The 9MM magazines for SIG Sauer P320 have received mixed feedback. While some users appreciate their performance and durability, others face serious issues, such as feeding problems, poor fit, and a susceptibility to jamming. Overall, many feel they are not reliable enough for serious use but might work for casual plinking.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Reliability and Performance
70%
Several reviewers pointed out significant reliability issues with these magazines, noting frequent failures to feed and jamming, which has caused frustration among users. A minority of users did report completely functional magazines, which indicates a variance in quality.
Fit and Compatibility
60%
A common complaint is that the magazines do not fit properly in the firearm's magazine well, leading to difficulties during use. This is particularly highlighted by users who attempted to use the magazines with different setups, showcasing a need for better design fitting.
Material Quality
65%
Multiple reviews criticized the construction of the magazines, mentioning that they feel cheap and flexible. Reviewers indicated that the plastic materials used are problematic, contributing to both wear and function issues.
Value for Money
75%
While some found the low price appealing, many concluded that the magazines were not worth the cost given their performance issues. Users felt that paying more for a reliable brand would likely be a better investment.
Customer Experience
50%
The overall shopping experience, particularly with returns and customer service, encountered mixed results. While some users successfully returned the faulty items, others expressed disappointment with the overall transaction process, indicating a lack of confidence in the product.
5
No Problems- I like these magazines.
I bought three of the 17 round magazines for my P320 Compact. I replaced the grip module with a Wilson Combat. I first bought two to try because of the negative reviews. I put them through a workout over the past two months. I filled them both to capacity, I used fewer rounds and did mag swap drills. No feed issues, not even one. They fed all types of foreign ammo (times are tough) and didn't miss a beat. I cannot speak to the experiences of others, but I really like the magazines, and I not only would buy them again, I already ordered more for my P320 and another for my VP9.