Veterans Day Saving Are On! - Take 17.76% Off Almost Everything
Use Code: HONOR1776

10% Off Regular Priced Ammo w/ Code: AMMO10

9MM MAGAZINES FOR GLOCK®17/18/19/19X/26/34/45/49 Reviews & Ratings

The ETS transparent and carbon smoke magazines for Glock® pistols take visibility and safety to new level. Users are able to quickly determine the round count and ammo type from any viewing angle. These mags have been through rigorous testing, including several thousands of rounds without failure, using all generations and size of Glock® pistols. ETS magazines function with a variety of ammunition types & styles.

Fully compatible with aftermarket base plates
Reliably lock back the slide on empty magazine
Drop free
Easy disassembly for cleaning
Specially designed base plate has a grip rib to aid in extraction
Advanced Transparent Polymer or Carbon Smoke Polymer
Testing included
- Repeated drops from 8ft fully loaded without breaking or cracking
- Extreme thermal conditions ranging from -60 to 180 deg F for extended periods
- Extremely elevated UV exposure for several months to insure it will not become brittle.
- Unmatched chemical resistance including Deet, Fuels, Cleaners
- Creep resistant, your mag will not creep/spread when stored fully loaded

DISCLAIMER: “GLOCK” is a federally registered trademark of GLOCK, Inc. and is one of many trademarks owned by GLOCK, Inc. or Glock®Ges.m.b.H. Neither Elite Tactical Systems nor this site are affiliated in any manner with, or otherwise endorsed by, GLOCK, Inc. or Glock®Ges.m.b.H. The use of “GLOCK” on this page is merely to advertise the sale of Glock®pistols, parts, or components. For genuine GLOCK, Inc. and Glock®Ges.m.b.H. products and parts visit www.Glock®.com.

View Product

Write a review

4 Stars

Reviews Summary

The 9MM magazines for Glock models receive mixed reviews from users. Many praise their reliability and performance after an initial break-in, while others experience jamming and design issues. The magazines' affordability and aesthetics are appreciated, but concerns about their durability and functionality under heavy use are prominent. Overall, they serve well for practice but may not be trusted for critical situations.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Reliability

65%

A significant number of reviewers report positive experiences with the reliability of the magazines after a break-in period. Many find them to perform well for regular use, especially in competitive settings. However, some users faced consistent jamming issues, highlighting a divide in their reliability across different use cases.

Durability

55%

Durability is a recurring concern. While some users have had success with these magazines under rigorous conditions, others report cracks and failures after heavy use. The contrast between users who find them reliable despite rough handling and those who encounter breakages suggests variability in quality.

Customer Service

40%

Customer service experiences are generally positive, with users mentioning prompt replacement of faulty parts. This reflects a commitment to customer satisfaction, even though some products initially failed to meet expectations.

Performance Under Stress

50%

Several reviewers shared their experiences using these magazines in extreme conditions, including during training and competition. While many reported good performance during normal use, others noted issues that arose after extended use, indicating potential weaknesses under stressful conditions.

Value for Money

70%

Many users find the value for money of these magazines quite appealing, especially compared to OEM options. Despite some complaints about reliability, the affordability and aesthetic appeal contribute positively to the overall perception of the product.

Sort by Filter by rating

Dont waste your money on junk

Garbage dont waste your money on this junk buy a p-mag I got one of these magazines and I only got 16 out of 17 rounds in it and it jammed so bad that I barely was able to unload it by hand very disappointed

Great for malfunction practice only

I bought six of these. All six jammed consistently resulting in failures to feed. The issue is in the design and fit of the follower. The follower is too loose in the mag body allowing the rounds to jam in between. I wrote ETS, they quickly sent me six new replacement followers (ETS customer service was good), and those worked better but still not perfect. Now two of my six magazines still jam. These are unreliable, and cannot be trusted for anything but malfunction drills. They do look cool though.

Waste of Money, get horrible over time

I am a LE Firearms Instructor and competition shooter. I bought several of these magazine to use for IDPA and training. they work fine at first, but the more you use them, maybe say a few hundred rounds, and their performance just goes to scrap. I gto a couple cracks near feed lips, chips that came off the edges of followers, and the follower would stick inside the tube not keeping the top round pushed towards the top. I got tired of messing with them and gave up. These will eventually cause your reliable Glock to give you some malfunction clearance practice. Beware

Failure

Neat concept - poorly executed. I purchased six of these mags to try out for a custom G17.4 build. I immediately noticed the rounds not "stacking" correctly in the mag. This did not allow for 17 rounds. I attempted to load and reload four of the mags to get an idea of the problem and if it was just one defective mag. All of the mags suffered from rounds jamming up inside the body of the mag. Also, out of the four mags, only two dropped free. I did not use the mags in live fire. Returned all six. Avoid these.

9mm mags okay, .40 cal awful

The 9mm extended mags seemed to work with only a couple of hiccups which could work out, time will tell. however, the 15 rd. .40 cal mags would not allow more than one round being fired before they jammed. Once fired, the next round would nose dive looking for the bottom of the magazine. Due to the malfunctions of the .40 cal. mags I cannot trust the 9mm mags for anything but range work until they prove out.