7.3/22 RINGS Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Summary
Customers appreciate the quality and finish of the 7.3/22 RINGS, noting they fit well on various .22 dovetail bases. Some critics found the screws overly tight and noted installation challenges, particularly with scratching. However, many praised their robust construction and adaptability. Overall, they are viewed as a reliable option in the market.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Product Quality
70%
Reviewers consistently highlight the robust construction and elegant design of the rings, affirming they set a high standard among .22 rings. The general sentiment reflects satisfaction with materials and craftsmanship.
Installation Challenges
50%
Several users reported difficulties during the installation process, particularly with overly tight screws and potential scratching of the scope. While some managed to resolve these issues, it indicates a design flaw that could be addressed for enhanced user experience.
Adaptability
60%
The rings' compatibility with both 11mm and 3/8" dovetails is praised, allowing for versatile use without needing multiple products. This feature is regarded as a significant advantage for users with different mounting systems.
Fit and Precision
50%
Many reviews noted the accurate fit of the rings on various rifles, minimizing adjustments needed post-installation. Users appreciated that windage adjustments are not necessary for the overall rigidity and performance of these rings.
Shipping Experience
30%
A few reviewers mentioned quick shipping times, contributing positively to their overall purchasing experience. Prompt delivery is often appreciated in online purchases and adds to overall customer satisfaction.
Not so great for my purposes...
Well, I pretty much use Warne rings exclusively; it goes without saying that I'm normally more than satisfied with their products. I bought these rings to use with the supplied rail for a Ruger 10-22. The attachment "legs" of these rings are an odd size. They are far too small to fit a Weaver/picatinny rail. On the 10-22, there's a second smaller rail that they did fit well enough to use the scope on the gun, but they were still too small to attach properly; they tilted the scope, and I don't believe the scope was centered to the bore line. Yes, I was able to use the scope, but I never felt right about it and ended up switching to some Leupold rings that fit the Weaver rail properly. Perhaps these were designed to fit another size of rail that I'm not familiar with? Even with a differently sized rail width, I'd still question whether or not the scope was centered to the bore line. Other than all of that, the materials and craftsmanship were typical of Warne's superior quality. I still intend to turn to Warne as my first choice for mounts; unfortunately, these rings leave me wondering if I missed a memo somewhere???
