1911 9MM MAGAZINES Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Summary
Overall, the 1911 9mm magazines have garnered mixed feedback. Many users appreciate their reliable feeding and compatibility with various 1911 models, highlighting their value for the price. However, some customers report issues with fit and mechanics, leading to concerns about performance in specific models. Quality control appears inconsistent, with reviews split on reliability.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Product Quality & Performance
70%
Reviewers frequently highlight the quality and functionality of the magazines, citing reliable feeding and compatibility with several 1911 models. However, performance can vary depending on the specific firearm, with both positive and negative experiences reported.
Fit and Compatibility Issues
45%
Several reviews mention difficulties with the magazines fitting certain 1911 models. Many customers have experienced tight fits or magazines that require modifications to function properly, which has led to frustration and dissatisfaction for some users.
Value for Money
60%
Many users praise these magazines for their affordability compared to higher-end options, suggesting they offer a good balance of quality and cost. Customers often feel satisfied with their purchase, especially when the magazines perform well.
Customer Experiences Vary
50%
The reviews reflect a wide range of customer experiences, with some thoroughly satisfied and others facing significant issues. This divergence indicates that while many users have had positive outcomes, there are inconsistent experiences that potential buyers should consider.
Shooting Competition Performance
40%
Some reviews particularly commend these magazines for use in shooting competitions, noting reliable performance under pressure. Users suggest that they perform well even during intense situations, making them viable options for competitive shooters.
Does not fit a bumper pad
Bought two blued magazines for my new Springfield Range Officer 9mm along with bumper pads to help with proper magazine seating in competition shooting. The two holes on the removable base of the magazine are not in the same location to allow the bumper pad to fit with the bottom. The holes are drilled 1/8" too far forward. In addition, the bottom plate is not completely flat so the bumper pad does not fit solidly when screwed on. The standard 1911 mags for the Springfield fit the bumper pad fine. The MetalForm magazine holes need to be re-drilled in the proper location in the bottom plate for a proper fit. The removal of the bottom plate for cleaning is also a definate challenge, as the parts do not fit well together with the spring base plate. I will be attempting to return them to Brownell's without even trying them with my Springfield.
