PMAG GL9 9MM LUGER HANDGUN MAGAZINE FOR GLOCK 19 Reviews & Ratings
Reviews Summary
The PMAG™ GL9™ magazines for Glock® 19 receive high praise for reliability and affordability, often outperforming OEM alternatives. While the lack of round-count windows and a stiff spring are noted downsides, most users appreciate their sturdy construction and compatibility. Overall, they are deemed excellent for range use and training, although some recommended sticking with OEM for self-defense.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Reliability
80%
A strong majority of reviewers emphasize the reliability of the PMAG™ GL9™ magazines, noting that they function flawlessly in various Glock models and other compatible firearms. Users report consistent performance with no malfunctions, which is critical for both training and defense situations.
Affordability
70%
Many customers highlight the attractive price point of these magazines, often referencing them as significantly cheaper than OEM options. This has led to increased purchases and satisfaction among users who are looking for value without compromising on quality.
Stiff Spring & Loading Difficulty
50%
Several reviews mention the stiff spring in the PMAG™ GL9™ magazines, making it challenging to load the last few rounds without assistance. This aspect has been noted as a minor inconvenience, particularly during extended range sessions.
Lack of Round Count Windows
40%
A common complaint among users is the absence of round-count view holes, which makes it difficult to track remaining ammunition. This was seen as a downside for those relying on the magazines for critical situations, with some customers wishing for an improvement.
Durability
60%
Reviewers frequently commend the durable construction of the PMAG™ GL9™ magazines, stating they are capable of withstanding wear and tear during extensive use. Many feel confident that they will last longer than standard OEM magazines in challenging conditions.
Glock 19 mags
The mag spring is very stiff. You can only load 9 rounds. The ninth round is really tough to load..
Ordered three, failures with one
I ordered three of these for use in IDPA. I marked the mags and went shooting. Of the three Ive had three failures using two different kinds of ammo on magazine number one. The other two have ran without issue. Of the three failures one was failure to feed and the other two were locked back slide with ammo still in the magazine. Im torn on how to rate these because the first mag has a far too high failure rate but the other two have not failed. I also have not put the volume of rounds through mags two and three as I have one so I dont know if this is an isolated incident or not. I will be sticking with factory mags from now on for competition and saving these for range days. I would not trust these for personal defense.
Well made but a few drawbacks
Overall, very well made product and I like the price.. Lighter than factory Glocks. No problems so far shooting. About 1/4" longer than factory due to removal able floor plate. Wasn't expecting that. Lastly, much stronger spring. Definitely need a mechanical assist to get #14 and #15 in. Perhaps will loosen up with time.

