RUGER 10/22 50RD MAGAZINE 22LR Reviews & Ratings

Dependable, super-capacity drum magazine lets you shoot 50-round strings of .22 LR ammunition in your 10/22® for plenty of plinking fun. No modifications to rifle needed; simply snaps into the mag well like the standard factory magazine. Tough, impact-resistant polycarbonate body and follower are self-lubricating, so they work with the constant-force spring to deliver smooth, uniform feeding for consistent operation. Smoke-tinted translucent body enables easy visual checks of ammo status. Steel hex screws anchored into brass bushings securely hold the body together to ensure exceptional strength and rigidity, yet are easily removed for disassembly and cleaning.

SPECS: Injection-molded polycarbonate, smoke. Fits Ruger® 10/22®, .22 LR only.

View Product

Write a review

Reviews Summary

The RUGER 10/22 50RD MAGAZINE has garnered mixed reviews. While some users appreciate its capacity and ease of use, many report significant jamming issues and mechanical failures, particularly with certain ammunition types. Quality control concerns arise from reports of wobbly fits and parts failure. However, others find it reliable and efficient after initial adjustments.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Reliability Issues

65%

A significant percentage of reviewers face reliability problems, particularly jamming and failure to feed rounds correctly. Many users report repeated operational issues regardless of the ammunition used, causing frustration and disappointment. This theme was mentioned by approximately 65% of reviewers.

Loading Mechanics

50%

Customers mention the complexities involved in loading the magazine, with some pointing out a lack of clear instructions that lead to improper use. Advances in loading designs seem beneficial, but initial hurdles can deter users. About 50% of reviewers commented on their experiences with loading processes.

Build Quality and Materials

45%

Several reviews highlight concerns regarding the build quality and materials used in the magazine, particularly around the fragility of the polymer and connection points, which can lead to breakage. This theme appears in 45% of the reviews, indicating a concerning trend regarding product construction.

Performance with Specific Ammunition

40%

Many users observe variations in performance depending on the type of ammunition used. While some brands work well, others, especially cheaper options, lead to feeding problems. This critique was referenced by nearly 40% of reviewers, emphasizing the importance of compatible ammo for optimal performance.

Customer Service Experience

20%

A few reviewers mention positive experiences with customer service, particularly in relation to product returns and exchanges. The presence of a lifetime warranty offered by the retailer contributes positively to the overall perception, noted by around 20% of the reviewers.

Sort by Filter by rating

Didn’t work for me

I took a chance on this magazine after reading the reviews. It jammed after three rounds fired every time. I tried it in three different 1022s including a high-end tactical solutions rifle. I still got the same problem jams after three rounds.

by Frank on April 29, 2024

Verified Purchase

Was this review helpful? 1

dont waste your money

i bought two of these for my 1022. neither of them worked and both jammed and failed to feed over half the time. what a complete waste of money. i returned them both and they sent me new ones. they also both failed consistently. i dont know how they can get away with making something that is total junk.

Regret purchasing this.

This has been used for almost 65 rounds. no amount of trimming or filing will allow the bolt to slide smoothly. It jams 2 different, new 10-22s. Before all was said and done the little pin which locks it in place sheared off rendering it useless, unless you want to spend 24 more dollars on a new tower. I am disgusted with the lack of quality on a higher priced accessory.