Fall Build Fest Continues - 15% OFF GUN PARTS THIS WEEK
Use Code: PARTS15

Fall Build Fest Continues - 15% OFF GUN PARTS THIS WEEK
Use Code: PARTS15

CAR-15 BUTTSTOCK MIL-SPEC

CAR-15 BUTTSTOCK MIL-SPEC Reviews & Ratings

Brownells has been working on a top quality option for those looking for a buttstock for a XM177 clone or early style AR build, and have teamed up with B5 Systems to bring this stock to market. With close attention paid to every detail these Mil-Spec stocks are a rugged, durable polymer construction.

  • Mil-Spec
  • Polymer construction
  • Color: Black

The Brownells CAR-15 stock gives you a quality, accurate, dependable, American made option for you AR or clone build.

See all of our AR15s and AR15 parts here.

View Product
Write a review
Reviews Summary
The CAR-15 Buttstock MIL-SPEC receives mixed reviews. Users praise its retro design and affordability, making it suitable for vintage builds. However, some report issues with fit, wobbliness, and rough edges affecting comfort. While many appreciate the lightweight design and aesthetics, others feel the quality doesn't match expectations, particularly for hardcore enthusiasts.
What Reviewers Are Saying
Product Design
60%
Many reviewers highlight the CAR-15 buttstock's retro design and its visual appeal for vintage builds, noting its accurate representation of older models, particularly fitting the aesthetic of Colt rifles. This design aspect is strongly appreciated among users building retro-style ARs, leading to a positive sentiment.
Quality and Construction
50%
Reviews frequently mention concerns regarding the product's quality, particularly about material thickness and overall sturdiness. Comments about rough edges and mold imperfections suggest that the construction may leave room for improvement. While some users approve its functionality, others expect a higher standard for the price point.
Fit and Compatibility
45%
Several reviews focus on the variance in fit across different buffer tubes, with some users experiencing difficulties during installation and removal. This inconsistency has led to dissatisfaction among a subset of customers, who report requiring tools to fit or remove the stock, indicating possible quality control issues.
Value for Money
55%
Despite concerns over quality, a majority of reviewers feel the stock offers good value for its price. Users appreciate the affordability compared to original aluminum stocks, noting that it serves well for a lightweight or retro build while remaining budget-friendly.
Comfort and Usability
40%
A number of users express satisfaction with shooting comfort when using the stock, noting its manageable weight and secure fit during usage. However, there are mixed reports regarding comfort levels influenced by the rough edges and wobbliness, suggesting a varied experience based on individual expectations.
3
Shoddy
Rough edges everywhere and the fit is extremely loose. Had to put some tape on my buffer tube to stop the clanking. Plastic seems strong though so at least that is something positive?
3
Decent quality for price
Good reproduction of the original N1 stocks. Rough edges on the plastic like another user noted, looks like it was very rushed. Stock also has a good bit of backwards and forwards play on 2 different buffer tubes, haven't tried using tape on the tubes yet but I shouldn't have to with a brand new product.