CAR-15 BUTTSTOCK MIL-SPEC Reviews & Ratings

Brownells has been working on a top quality option for those looking for a buttstock for a XM177 clone or early style AR build, and have teamed up with B5 Systems to bring this stock to market. With close attention paid to every detail these Mil-Spec stocks are a rugged, durable polymer construction.

Mil-Spec
Polymer construction
Color: Black

The Brownells CAR-15 stock gives you a quality, accurate, dependable, American made option for you AR or clone build.

See all of our AR15s and AR15 parts here.

View Product

Write a review

2 Stars

Reviews Summary

The CAR-15 Buttstock MIL-SPEC receives mixed reviews. Users praise its retro design and affordability, making it suitable for vintage builds. However, some report issues with fit, wobbliness, and rough edges affecting comfort. While many appreciate the lightweight design and aesthetics, others feel the quality doesn't match expectations, particularly for hardcore enthusiasts.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Product Design

60%

Many reviewers highlight the CAR-15 buttstock's retro design and its visual appeal for vintage builds, noting its accurate representation of older models, particularly fitting the aesthetic of Colt rifles. This design aspect is strongly appreciated among users building retro-style ARs, leading to a positive sentiment.

Quality and Construction

50%

Reviews frequently mention concerns regarding the product's quality, particularly about material thickness and overall sturdiness. Comments about rough edges and mold imperfections suggest that the construction may leave room for improvement. While some users approve its functionality, others expect a higher standard for the price point.

Fit and Compatibility

45%

Several reviews focus on the variance in fit across different buffer tubes, with some users experiencing difficulties during installation and removal. This inconsistency has led to dissatisfaction among a subset of customers, who report requiring tools to fit or remove the stock, indicating possible quality control issues.

Value for Money

55%

Despite concerns over quality, a majority of reviewers feel the stock offers good value for its price. Users appreciate the affordability compared to original aluminum stocks, noting that it serves well for a lightweight or retro build while remaining budget-friendly.

Comfort and Usability

40%

A number of users express satisfaction with shooting comfort when using the stock, noting its manageable weight and secure fit during usage. However, there are mixed reports regarding comfort levels influenced by the rough edges and wobbliness, suggesting a varied experience based on individual expectations.

Sort by Filter by rating

don't waste your money

It looks the part ,but feels cheap. Thin plastic with a flimsy lever. Save your money and try to find the aluminum version.

by Johny on March 31, 2023

Verified Purchase

Was this review helpful? 4

Not worth the money

It wobbles noticeably, there are multiple sharp "seams" left over from the molding process that need to be sanded or they will scratch up your arms, and the latch used to reposition the stock is gritty and sticks, no matter how much CLP i put on it. $43 is way too much for this chinesium tier product. There are much better alternatives at the same price point. I'm genuinely disappointed, Brownells.

Don't waste your money

For something made by brownells and b5 systems this leaves a lot to be desired. I had to use a mallet to remove this clearly-out-of-spec stock. When there were no flat surfaces left to hit, I destroyed the locking channel underneath to finally get it off. Left my milspec buffer tube marred and scratched, and that wasn't even from using tools, it was from the stock and locking bolt.

Cool but dissapointing

I will update this review if my issue can be resolved. First off, Brownells is an amazing company and this issue is not with Brownells. Like some people have reviewed, this moulding is not great. I have a milspec buffer tube and I had to use a mallet to even get it on the tube. Once it was on, it was so tight I could barley get it off the tube. Some of the edges of the plastic were a little rough around the edges. I'm going to try to exchange it because I guess others have had better luck. Brownells, can you do a stock check on these? It seems to be a rather common occurrence.

does not fit

Does not fit the buffer tube of either of my ar, have to force it on then it gets stuck about an inch on to the tube. Will not go any further had to use a hammer to get it back off. Measured the stock with my micrometer and it's egg shaped and the distance between the top and bottom are 0.016" short of fitting