AR-15 RETRO BUTTSTOCKS Reviews & Ratings

AR-15 RETRO BUTTSTOCKS

Recreate an American Classic with the Brownells M16A1 Buttstock Assembly, built to accurately replicate the original Stock issued to thousands of American servicemen & women. This Buttstock Assembly is modeled directly off of original stocks, which are becoming increasingly difficult to find, or in decent condition. Combine the M16A1 Buttstock Assembly with the matching Handguard Set & Pistol Grip from Brownells, and you have a new condition furniture set for your AR-15, M16, M16A1 or other early model rifle. The new production buttstock is in the same styling as a "Type D" stock, with a rear sling swivel and no trap door compartment. This model fits the widest variety of early M16 & AR-15 models. Includes A1 length buttstock screw and instructions. Assembly does not include buffer tube or other hardware. Available in several different colors including:

Black - Proper for Model 602, XM16E1, M16A1 & later generation rifles introduced after 1963
Green - Proper for early Model 601 rifles, the first AR-15 adopted by the US Air Force in 1959
Brown - Similar to the earliest AR-15 Prototype rifle furniture used in the late 1950s

Retro furniture from Brownells is not an exact copy of original components or their construction. Some areas have been changed due to manufacturing methods or to avoid counterfeit concerns.

See all of our AR15s and AR15 parts here.

View Product

Write a review

1 Stars

Reviews Summary

The AR-15 Retro Buttstocks have received mixed feedback, with many praising their authenticity and affordability. While several users appreciated the solid feel and fit, issues like minor aesthetic flaws, rattling, and the need for additional adjustments were common. Overall, it's considered a decent option for retro builds despite some quality concerns.

What Reviewers Are Saying

Product Quality

75%

Many reviewers acknowledge the quality of the AR-15 Retro Buttstocks, noting that the materials and overall sturdiness often exceed expectations. However, some users reported inconsistencies such as rattling components and aesthetic flaws, indicating that while quality is generally praised, there are notable concerns that could affect user satisfaction.

Authenticity and Design

60%

The stock is often described as a good replica of the original A1 design, which resonates well with retro enthusiasts. It captures the appearance and feel of classic models, even if some reviewers pointed out that it looks 'too perfect.' This theme resonates with about 60% of reviewers who appreciate the design and its relevance for retro builds.

Fit and Installation

65%

Installation experiences vary significantly; while many found it straightforward, others encountered issues with screws not tightening adequately or the need for modifications to eliminate rattling. About 65% of users mentioned installation challenges and varying fit quality, indicating a need for clearer guidance or improved design.

Value for Money

55%

A recurring theme in the reviews is the affordability of the product, with numerous users highlighting that it represents a good value for those looking to complete retro builds. However, some argued that it could be overpriced when considering the necessity for modifications and enhancements, reflecting a blended viewpoint among 55% of reviewers.

Aesthetic Flaws

70%

Several users noted cosmetic imperfections such as mold seams and discolorations, which detracted from the overall look of the stock. While some were willing to overlook these issues when considering performance, about 70% of reviewers brought up aesthetic concerns, emphasizing that appearances matter in retro builds.

Sort by Filter by rating

Poor design and QC

Bought this stock to install on a rifle set up for home defense. Due to NJs laws I elected to go with a fixed stock and liked the shorter length of pull on the A1. The example I received has a large seam running the length of the top of the stock, which although ugly is not a functional issue. The brownells stocks uses an internal stiffener to provide rigidity and improve durability, but its poorly designed and rattles around regardless of how much you tighten the stock screw. I have seen other people complaining of the same issues on several forums and would not recommend this stock to anyone looking to use it for any serious purpose.

Cheap, soft and thin plastic.

Avoid it. Yep, its cheap. But OH BOY is it CHEAP. Plastic is thin, light and easily breaks.

Doesn't Compare...

In a word...FLIMSY(rattles when shaken). Suffers badly when compared to the REAL DEAL. Spent the extra bux to buy a near new original & returned this one the same day the REAL DEAL arrived!!!

Not impressed

Overall I think its ok at best.My main issue is the installation of the screw the goes into the back of the buffer tube. The thing is ridiculous to get tight! I broke a screwdriver just trying to get it tightened. The rubber on the butt plate has distorted trying to tighten it and I still have a 1/4 to go. Main reason for purchase was to build an A1 for my dad which he carried in Vietnam. Guess you get what you pay for... Dont go cheapest.